This article is in continuation of our previous article
Therefore, it is difficult to form an opinion on how bad or what the significance of the agreement is.
It should be honestly stated that the absence of an agreement with Iran serves Israel more than any agreement would.
A long-term naval blockade can achieve good results and perhaps even bring down the regime.
If the blockade is lifted and the regime remains in place—which is likely to happen if an agreement is signed (without getting into or knowing the details of the agreement)—this is a less favorable situation for Israel, because the regime will be able to recover, and it is clear to any reasonable person that its murderous ambitions toward Israel will not change.
On the other hand, one must recognize the reality that sometimes the United States has interests that are not shared with Israel, even though this is the most friendly American administration Israel has ever had. There is not 100% overlap, as Vice President J.D. Vance pointed out in recent days. According to him, the U.S. acts first according to its own interests. One can be angry about this, one can disagree with it, but that is the reality—by the way, Israel also acts this way in cases where there is a split in interests with the U.S. (for example, the entry into Rafah).
I recommend waiting for the details of the agreement and seeing if the Iranians will indeed agree to remove the uranium from their territory—which is one of Trump’s main demands—which I do not see the Iranians agreeing to.
In summary: An agreement in general between the U.S. and the current Iranian regime is less favorable for Israel than the absence of an agreement. Nevertheless, it is worth waiting for the details before deciding one way or the other. Let’s keep our fingers crossed that the Iranians themselves will ruin this as well.
